Readiness check

Is your digital twin a working tool or a 3D picture?

A digital twin only pays off when it is connected to live data, kept current, and used to make an operations decision. A static handover model nobody updates is a 3D picture, not a twin. Answer for how your twin is actually built and used. The score stays on your device; enter an email only if you want the digital twin checklist sent over.

1. Is the twin connected to live data (BAS, IoT sensors), not just a static model?Yes, live data feeds the twinA static model, no live feedWe just call the BIM model a twin

2. Is there an accurate as-built model behind it (tagged equipment, real geometry)?Yes, an accurate as-built with tagged assetsAn outdated or rough modelNo reliable as-built

3. Is there a clear use case it serves (asset management, maintenance, energy)?Yes, one or more real use casesWe built it without a clear useNobody is sure what it is for

4. Was the twin built from the commissioning handover (as-built + equipment data), not after the fact?Yes, born from the handover dataWe are trying to rebuild it laterWe got a pile of PDFs

5. Is the asset and equipment data structured (COBie or similar), not loose documents?Yes, structured asset dataMixed, some structuredLoose PDFs and folders

6. Is there a plan to keep the twin current as the building changes?Yes, the twin is maintainedNot really, it will driftIt is already stale

7. Does the FM team actually open and use it?Yes, it is part of daily operationsOccasionallyNobody opens it

8. Did you start with one valuable use case rather than an everything-twin?Yes, focused and proven, then scaledWe tried to model everythingNo focus