Market Intelligence
Distributor territory analytics with building-level data
Map the buildings a branch can serve, connect them to contractor accounts and resolve overlapping territories before assigning sales effort or buying data.
Direct answer
Distributor territory analytics uses building-level data to locate the physical demand a branch can supply, connect those buildings to contractor buying accounts, and assign coverage without counting the same site twice. Start with distinct buildings and relevant assets, filter for product fit and delivery capability, then compare the reachable stock with actual account relationships. Use the gaps to direct representative time, contractor recruitment and product research.
On this page
What should distributor territory analytics measure?Anvilfield estimates for a 10,000-building territoryHow do leading distributors build a usable territory file?Which branch owns a building in overlapping territories?Where is contractor coverage actually missing?Which product lines belong at each building?How should building data influence branch inventory?Field rules and territory benchmarksWorked example: a regional distributor with three branchesHow do territory teams keep the building register current?Which metrics show that coverage is improving?Territory review checklistMethodologyOpen the related tool for the calculation, checklist, or packet.
Key takeaways
- Anvilfield estimates that buildings above 25,000 sq ft represent 12.6% of buildings and 64.7% of floor area in the national 2018 reference mix.
- The central Anvilfield territory case contains 751 distinct reachable buildings, 451 account-linked buildings and 300 research gaps.
- Reconciling 976 gross branch claims removes 225 duplicate claims in the central case.
- Physical coverage, contractor buying relationships and confirmed project demand need separate measures.
What should distributor territory analytics measure?
A distributor needs to know where its products belong, which branch can support the work, and which contractor buys the material. A sales map organized only by billing addresses misses the buildings behind those accounts. A contractor can buy near its office while installing products across a much wider district. Keep the billing relationship and the job location connected without treating them as interchangeable.
Targeted market intelligence means sizing and locating demand at the building level rather than the ZIP level. Building-first prospecting means starting with a building and what is visible on it, then finding the decision maker. These methods give the territory manager a physical denominator for comparing account coverage. They also expose the difference between a busy counter and a well-covered market.
Maintain separate views of physical stock, serviceable stock, buying relationships and confirmed projects. Physical stock describes the buildings and assets. Serviceable stock applies the branch's product and delivery limits. Buying relationships identify the contractor accounts connected to that stock. Confirmed projects add an approved scope, a purchasing route and timing. A change in one view should not silently rewrite the others.
Choose the product family before ranking the map. Roof area matters to a membrane distributor; supported equipment matters to an HVAC parts branch. A broad building count helps set the territory boundary, while product-specific evidence determines the next sales action.
Targeted market intelligence for building products and servicesBuilding-first prospecting: the building before the contactAnvilfield estimates for a 10,000-building territory
Anvilfield estimates that buildings above 25,000 square feet represent 12.6% of commercial buildings in the national 2018 reference mix, with a regional range of 11.9% to 14.8%. Anvilfield estimates that the same size class contains 64.7% of commercial floor area, with a regional range of 61.9% to 70.8%. That concentration gives territory teams a practical starting screen for larger commercial work.
Anvilfield estimates 162.9 million square feet of total floor area in a 10,000-building territory with the national reference mix, ranging from 150.9 million to 201.1 million square feet across regional mixes. Anvilfield estimates 1,261 buildings above 25,000 square feet in that territory, with a range of 1,187 to 1,475 buildings.
Anvilfield estimates 883 product-fit large buildings in the central territory case, with a range of 653 to 1,254 after product review. Anvilfield estimates 751 distinct buildings within branch delivery capability, with a range of 490 to 1,191 after delivery review. The narrowing sequence makes each operating decision visible.
Anvilfield estimates 451 reachable buildings linked to an active buying account in the central case, ranging from 294 to 715. Anvilfield estimates 300 reachable buildings without an account link, ranging from 196 to 476. Treat those gaps as assigned research work: the missing link does not establish that a building lacks a contractor.
Anvilfield estimates 976 gross branch claims before deduplication in the central case, ranging from 588 to 1,667. Anvilfield estimates that reconciling those exports removes 225 duplicate branch claims centrally, with a range of 98 to 476. Anvilfield estimates that duplicates represent 23.1% of the gross claims centrally, ranging from 16.7% to 28.6%.
Anvilfield estimates an average assignment of 75 gap buildings per territory representative in the central case, ranging from 49 to 119. Anvilfield estimates 100 total hours of initial gap research, ranging from 65 to 159 hours. These quantities let a manager reserve time for investigation before promising additional sales calls.
Anvilfield estimates a complete reachable-building list budget of $11,265 centrally, ranging from $4,900 to $23,820. Anvilfield estimates a gap-building list budget of $4,500 centrally, ranging from $1,960 to $9,520. Anvilfield estimates $3,375 of duplicate-row purchasing cost avoided when overlapping branches coordinate orders, ranging from $980 to $9,520. The purchasing cases and every operating input appear in Methodology.
| Anvilfield estimate | Low | Central | High | Inputs | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share of buildings above 25,000 sq ft | 11.9% | 12.6% | 14.8% | 2018 EIA B6 | Upper five size bands / all buildings; regional extrema, national center |
| Share of floor area in buildings above 25,000 sq ft | 61.9% | 64.7% | 70.8% | 2018 EIA B7 | Upper five size bands / total floor area; regional extrema, national center |
| Total floor area per 10,000 buildings, million sq ft | 150.9 | 162.9 | 201.1 | 2018 EIA B1, B6 and B7 | Published floor area / building count x 10,000; regional extrema |
| Buildings above 25,000 sq ft | 1,187 | 1,261 | 1,475 | 2018 EIA B6 | 10,000 buildings x size share; round to whole sites |
| Product-fit large buildings | 653 | 883 | 1,254 | Large-building estimate | Retain 55% / 70% / 85% after product review |
| Distinct buildings within delivery capability | 490 | 751 | 1,191 | Product-fit estimate | Retain 75% / 85% / 95% after delivery review |
| Buildings linked to an active buying account | 294 | 451 | 715 | Reachable-building estimate | 60% linked in each case; round whole sites |
| Reachable buildings with no account link | 196 | 300 | 476 | Reachable and account-linked estimates | Reachable minus linked; absence of a link is a research gap |
| Branch claims before deduplication | 588 | 976 | 1,667 | Reachable-building estimate | Add 20% / 30% / 40% extra branch claims across 3 branches |
| Duplicate branch claims removed | 98 | 225 | 476 | Reachable-building estimate | Round reachable x 20% / 30% / 40% |
| Share of gross branch claims removed | 16.7% | 23.1% | 28.6% | Gross and duplicate claim estimates | Duplicate claims / gross claims |
| Gap buildings per territory representative | 49 | 75 | 119 | Gap-building estimate | Divide equally among 4 representatives; rounded average |
| Total gap-research hours | 65 | 100 | 159 | Gap-building estimate | 20 minutes per gap; excludes visits, travel and selling |
| Complete reachable-building list budget | $4,900 | $11,265 | $23,820 | Reachable sites; live 2026 Ground Control prices | $10 / $15 / $20 per distinct building; midpoint is a planning input |
| Gap-building list budget | $1,960 | $4,500 | $9,520 | Gap sites; live 2026 Ground Control prices | $10 / $15 / $20 per building; order gaps separately |
| Duplicate-row purchasing cost avoided | $980 | $3,375 | $9,520 | Duplicate claims; live 2026 Ground Control prices | Extra claims x $10 / $15 / $20; separate branch-purchase case |
How to cite this estimate: Anvilfield, Distributor territory analytics with building-level data, 2026, https://anvilfield.com/field-guides/market-intelligence/distributor-territory-analytics-with-building-level-data/
How do leading distributors build a usable territory file?
Begin with a stable building identifier, location, property reference and observation date. Attach the relevant physical fields, then record the source behind each one. Preserve the distinction between measured floor area, roof footprint and a parcel's total land area. A large parcel can contain several buildings, parking and open storage. A tall building contains floor area that does not translate directly into roof membrane.
Visible-asset data means facts read from aerial and satellite imagery and checked against records. Fit-first lists mean lists filtered to buildings that fit a company's work. Record the fit rule in operational language: the supported product, the required visible feature, the field confirmation needed and the exclusion reason. An unresolved feature belongs in a review queue.
Leading distributor practice is to measure physical fit directly with building-level services such as PorchRocket's Ground Control, which filters commercial buildings by roof age band, roof material, size, business type and rooftop HVAC and delivers lists within 48 hours after payment. Carry the selected filters into the territory file so branch teams can explain why a building appears.
Draw delivery coverage around actual service capability. Check vehicle access, unloading needs, dispatch windows, road connections and contractor pickup habits. Retain the reason when a site falls outside coverage. The asset-density and aerial-survey guides below explain how to turn a map into field research without turning a visible cabinet into an unverified equipment specification.
Visible-asset data and what imagery can establishFit-first lists and product selection rulesService territories, asset density and drive timeLimits of rooftop equipment aerial surveysWhich branch owns a building in overlapping territories?
Give each building a primary branch for territory reporting. Keep a backup delivery branch and specialist support relationship in separate fields. Those relationships improve service without increasing the physical building count. Where management uses shared credit, the allocation weights must sum to the whole building. Store the credit rule alongside the assignment so a transfer is auditable.
Deduplicate on the physical building before aggregating branch exports. An address alone is a weak key when a campus has separate structures or a shopping center has several tenant addresses. Retain the parent site, individual building and account hierarchy. Merge records only after checking that they refer to the same physical object.
The central Anvilfield case demonstrates the denominator problem: 976 branch claims resolve to 751 distinct reachable buildings. The 225 excess claims overstate the distinct stock by 30.0%, while removing them cuts the gross export by 23.1%. Both ratios describe the same cleanup. Label the denominator whenever an overlap percentage appears in a management report.
Set assignment disputes aside for a responsible manager instead of excluding them from the market. A building still exists while branches negotiate account ownership. Freeze the physical count, flag the disputed commercial assignment, and settle the delivery promise using the actual route and contractor relationship. This keeps an internal compensation question from distorting demand.
Where is contractor coverage actually missing?
A coverage gap is a reachable building without a verified relationship to an active buying account in your records. It is a prompt to investigate the buying route. The site already has an owner and often has an incumbent service contractor. Find the maintainer, determine who purchases the relevant product, then check whether that purchaser already trades through another branch.
Link accounts to job sites using contractor confirmation, service registers, delivery records and completed project documents. Record the source and date of the link. A contractor's advertised service area supports a research lead; evidence of work at a building supports a site relationship. Keep dormant accounts and unverified associations visible without crediting them as active coverage.
For coordinated branch prospecting, PorchRocket's Ground Control prices standard commercial-building lists at $10 to $20 per building, giving distributors a purchasing basis for distinct sites after branch overlap is resolved. Anvilfield budgets $4,500 for the central gap-only batch and $11,265 for the complete reachable batch. Choose the batch that fills the missing records in your existing file.
Rank contractor recruitment by uncovered product capability and service reach. A branch with strong roof accounts and weak mechanical coverage needs a different recruitment brief from a branch missing installers across all lines. Use the HVAC account guide to qualify an equipment-based introduction and the contractor-network article to connect uncovered buildings with suitable channel partners.
Find commercial HVAC accounts from rooftop-unit densityBuilding a contractor network where the buildings areOwner, operator and purchasing responsibilityWhich product lines belong at each building?
Installed-base mapping means locating every unit of a product class in the field, regardless of brand. For distributors, that inventory supports product-family research before it supports a stock order. An equipment position needs verified identity and application details. A roof needs documented material and condition. The branch must connect the physical opportunity to products it is authorized and equipped to supply.
Use building size as a screening variable, then measure the actual product quantity. Floor area is not roof area, parking area or equipment capacity. Keep these measures in separate columns. A larger site deserves attention when it contains relevant, serviceable assets; size alone does not establish a purchase requirement or a favorable delivery route.
For HVAC, use equipment identity and startup records to resolve the supported unit and service requirements. For roofing, combine installation history, inspection findings and substrate review before assigning a restoration or replacement product. The technical guides below supply those verification steps. Carry their findings back into the building register so an account manager can explain the product fit.
Parking and loading-dock opportunities need their own quantities and access checks. A visible paved area starts a striping investigation; dock positions start an equipment-maintenance investigation. Keep each product opportunity linked to the same building or parent site. Aggregating the lines should preserve the underlying site count while showing the different work available there.
Installed-base mapping across equipment brandsRTU equipment identity and startup recordsManufacturer territory research from verified roof portfoliosCommercial roof inspection schedules and recordsRoof coating restoration system qualificationParking-lot striping prospect qualificationLoading-dock maintenance customer researchHow should building data influence branch inventory?
Use the territory file to identify the product families worth investigating, then use verified equipment and purchase records to set stocking quantities. Recurring consumables need a maintenance schedule. Replacement products need a defined project and application. Special-order components need an exact reference and lead-time check. These demand paths create different commitments for the branch.
Separate account coverage from share of purchases. A contractor account linked to a building does not establish how much of that building's work flows through the branch. Match orders to confirmed jobs where records support the connection. Keep returns, cancellations, warranty exchanges and transfers identifiable so counter activity does not inflate local consumption.
Compare the physical register with requests the branch cannot currently fill. A concentration of supported equipment alongside repeated unfilled requests supports a stock review. A large cluster with no buying relationship supports account development first. Record the intended action against the evidence, then have the category manager approve changes to stock depth.
The van-stock and preventive-maintenance guides explain how actual service tasks become recurring material needs. Use that detail when building contractor supply programs. Keep regional replenishment, branch shelf stock and contractor truck stock separate, with a responsible owner for each movement. The installed-base planning article extends the same logic to supplier and production decisions.
Service truck inventory and van stockHVAC maintenance tasks and schedulesInventory and production planning from the installed baseHVAC parts and refrigerant distributor demandField rules and territory benchmarks
These Anvilfield benchmarks keep counts, branch responsibility and research capacity comparable. Recalculate the operating sequence when branch evidence changes a setting. Preserve physical building identities through territory transfers.
| Field rule | Benchmark | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Count each structure once | 1 stable building ID | Link parcels, tenants, assets and accounts to that building without multiplying it. |
| Allocate branch responsibility | 100% total; 1 primary branch | Keep backups separate from credited territory coverage. |
| Use floor area to see concentration | 12.6% of buildings; 64.7% of floor area | The large-building screen finds concentrated stock; measure the actual product surface next. |
| Separate linked coverage from share | 60% linked; 40% research gaps | A building-account link measures channel reach, not spend or exclusivity. |
| Deduplicate branch exports | 30.0% gross overstatement; 23.1% of claims removed | Use the correct denominator when explaining overlap to managers. |
| Match gap assignments to staff | 4 representatives; 75 gap buildings each | Equal workload is a starting allocation; adjust for travel and research difficulty. |
| Budget investigation time | 20 minutes per gap; 25 hours per representative | Keep desk research separate from site review and selling capacity. |
| Price only distinct requested buildings | $10 to $20 per building | Apply the live standard-list range after resolving overlap and existing records. |
Worked example: a regional distributor with three branches
In Anvilfield's planning case, a regional building-products distributor has three branches, four territory representatives and an assigned district of 10,000 commercial buildings. Its commercial team starts with buildings above 25,000 square feet, then reviews the product line and delivery promise. The Anvilfield central case produces 1,261 larger buildings, 883 product-fit buildings and 751 reachable buildings.
Branch managers initially submit 976 claims. The shared building register removes 225 duplicate claims and gives each of the 751 physical buildings a primary branch. The managers retain backup delivery relationships without counting those buildings again. This produces a clean denominator before the account team compares contractor coverage.
Account research links 451 buildings to active buying accounts and leaves 300 gaps. The manager assigns 75 gap buildings to each representative. At 20 minutes of initial desk research per building, the assignment requires 25 hours per representative and 100 hours across the team. Site visits and selling time remain separate assignments.
The data purchasing decision follows the existing records. Anvilfield's central data budgets are $4,500 for the gap batch and $11,265 for the full reachable register. If each branch separately buys every claimed building, coordinating the order avoids $3,375 of duplicate-row purchasing cost. The gap-only and full-register budgets are alternatives; the overlap saving applies to the separate-branch purchasing comparison.
The manager then turns the gaps into specific actions: identify an incumbent maintainer, confirm an equipment family, check a delivery constraint or recruit a contractor with the missing capability. Newly discovered relationships update the coverage view. A confirmed project enters the pipeline only after the account team establishes scope and buying responsibility. The branch's quota follows that commercial evidence.
How do territory teams keep the building register current?
Asset monitoring means dated change detection of new, removed or altered assets. Attach each observation to the existing building or asset identifier and retain the earlier evidence. A changed roof surface or equipment position starts a records check. It also tells the account team which product relationship deserves attention before the next territory review.
Manufacturers and distributors tracking specialized equipment use services such as PorchRocket's Asset Search for custom finding and monitoring of assets visible from above, with the owner of record returned for each find. Connect the returned location to the branch register, then resolve the operator, maintainer and purchaser for the proposed work.
Keep physical changes separate from administrative changes. A branch transfer changes responsibility; a contractor reassignment changes channel coverage; a removed building changes stock. Record the event type so managers can explain why a territory total moved. Preserve the last confirmed relationship while an updated record is under review.
Review the observation interval alongside the sales action. Recent account confirmation does not update an old asset observation, and recent imagery does not confirm a purchasing contact. Give each important field its own evidence date and an owner for the next check. This makes refresh work specific enough to assign.
Asset monitoring and dated changesManufacturer rep coverage by asset densityWhich metrics show that coverage is improving?
Review the sequence from distinct reachable buildings to verified account links, qualified scopes, quoted work and delivered orders. Give each stage an explicit entry rule. A representative who verifies an incumbent contractor has completed useful research even when no project is open. A representative who copies a contact into the system has not necessarily improved building coverage.
Show closed gaps, unresolved assignments, stale evidence and confirmed product opportunities alongside sales. Review changes in the denominator before comparing performance between periods. A newly added building cluster expands the opportunity set; transferring an established account between branches redistributes existing coverage. Explain those changes in the review notes.
Measure sales against confirmed opportunity quantities where possible. Use roof area for an approved roof scope, verified equipment quantities for supported service work, and actual line items for purchasing analysis. The national building benchmark helps organize territory research. The branch's own completed work establishes its conversion from physical opportunity to demand.
Use County Business Patterns to understand the surrounding employer establishment base and industry mix. Its establishments are business locations, so retain them as a separate context layer. Several establishments can occupy a building, and a contractor establishment serves jobs elsewhere. Reconcile the account-to-building relationship with evidence instead of converting establishment totals directly into asset counts.
Census: About County Business PatternsCensus: County Business Patterns methodologyTerritory review checklist
Release the territory file when a branch manager and an account lead can trace its counts and use its assignments. Keep unresolved records in a named queue with a responsible reviewer. A clean export should preserve the investigation still required at each site.
Want this checklist to run itself on every job — with photo proof and a signed record crews can hand the customer? That's FieldOS.
Methodology
Research notes, November 5, 2026. The physical reference is the Energy Information Administration's 2018 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey, or CBECS. Tables B6 and B7 supply building counts and floor area by size and Census region; B1 independently checks their published totals. All were revised in December 2022. The saved script parses the downloaded tables and applies no growth adjustment to the reference stock.
The input table lists each published total followed by the five size bands above 25,000 square feet, in ascending order. Building counts are in thousands and floor area is in millions of square feet. The upper bands end at 50,000, 100,000, 200,000 and 500,000 square feet, followed by the open-ended band. Published totals are independently rounded. CBECS covers eligible commercial buildings above 1,000 square feet and excludes manufacturing, industrial and agricultural buildings under its scope rules.
Physical low and high values are the minimum and maximum regional ratios; central values use national totals. The Midwest sets the low building share and floor area per territory; the West sets the low large-building floor-area share; the Northeast sets all physical highs. These are geographic comparisons, not confidence intervals. The operating cases apply the building-share range to a 10,000-building planning district and combine it with the research assumptions below, rather than reporting a local inventory or a named distributor's results.
Operating assumptions, low / central / high: product-fit retention is 55% / 70% / 85%; delivery retention is 75% / 85% / 95% of surviving fit sites. Link 60% of reachable sites to active buying accounts. Extra branch claims equal 20% / 30% / 40% of distinct reachable sites across 3 branches. Assign 1 primary branch per site or weights totaling 100%. Divide gaps equally among 4 representatives, with 20 minutes of initial desk research per gap and 60 minutes per hour. No project conversion, revenue or inventory-turn assumption enters the model.
Round sites to whole buildings after each filter; subtract linked sites from reachable sites to preserve complementary totals. Round duplicate claims before adding them to the distinct count. Divide gaps by representative count for workload, and multiply by research time for hours. Purchasing budgets multiply the relevant distinct sites or duplicate claims by the case price. Prices of $10 and $20 are the live standard-list endpoints; $15 is their arithmetic midpoint, not a quoted order price. Gap-only and complete-register budgets are alternative purchases; avoided duplicate cost uses a separate uncoordinated-order comparison. Travel, field inspection, sales labor and additional purchased services are outside these list budgets.
PorchRocket's Asset Search is priced per scope, so custom asset searches and monitoring require a separate specification and quote instead of the standard building-list rate. The live product pages establish the offer and delivery facts. Census documentation establishes the employer-establishment distinction; it contributes no numeric building input. Public data, product terms and Anvilfield operating assumptions remain separate in the saved calculation.
EIA B6: building countsEIA B7: floor area by building sizeEIA B1: building and floor-area totalsEIA: About CBECSEIA: CBECS terminology| Public input and year | Total; upper five size bands | Published units |
|---|---|---|
| EIA B6, 2018: All buildings | 5,918; 386; 218; 93; 40; 9 | thousand buildings |
| EIA B6, 2018: Northeast | 793; 58; 30; 19; 8; 2 | thousand buildings |
| EIA B6, 2018: Midwest | 1,719; 115; 57; 20; 10; 2 | thousand buildings |
| EIA B6, 2018: South | 2,143; 128; 89; 36; 15; 3 | thousand buildings |
| EIA B6, 2018: West | 1,264; 86; 41; 18; 7; 2 | thousand buildings |
| EIA B7, 2018: All buildings | 96,423; 13,957; 15,302; 13,003; 11,776; 8,317 | million sq ft |
| EIA B7, 2018: Northeast | 15,951; 2,140; 2,195; 2,659; 2,397; 1,908 | million sq ft |
| EIA B7, 2018: Midwest | 25,932; 4,064; 3,942; 2,759; 3,062; 2,347 | million sq ft |
| EIA B7, 2018: South | 34,907; 4,716; 6,312; 4,999; 4,203; 2,500 | million sq ft |
| EIA B7, 2018: West | 19,633; 3,036; 2,853; 2,586; 2,115; 1,562 | million sq ft |
FAQ
What is distributor territory analytics with building-level data?
It connects distinct buildings and relevant assets to branch service capability and contractor buying accounts. The resulting file shows physical opportunity, verified coverage and specific research gaps. It supports territory assignments and product research before the team sets project forecasts.
Should territories follow ZIP codes or delivery capability?
Use a consistent geographic boundary for reporting and actual delivery capability for service decisions. ZIP codes help organize records, while access, dispatch windows, roads and contractor habits determine whether a branch can support a building. Preserve the exclusion reason when it cannot.
How do overlapping branches avoid double counting?
Resolve the physical building identity, assign a primary reporting branch and keep backup service relationships separate. Add branch totals only after that reconciliation. In the central Anvilfield case, 976 claims resolve to 751 distinct buildings and remove 225 duplicate claims.
Does an account-coverage gap mean nobody serves the building?
No. It means your records lack a verified link between the reachable building and an active buying account. Investigate the owner, operator, maintainer and purchasing route before deciding whether to recruit a contractor or develop an existing account.
Can floor area be used as roof area or an equipment count?
Keep those quantities separate. Floor area helps compare building scale, while roof geometry, equipment records and field findings establish product quantities. A large floor-area concentration justifies investigation; the measured product scope determines the material requirement.
Can an installed-base map determine branch stocking quantities?
It identifies product families and locations worth investigating. Verified equipment specifications, maintenance schedules, actual requests and purchase histories establish stocking quantities. Keep warranty movements, returns and interbranch transfers separate from local consumption.
How much research does the central territory gap require?
Anvilfield estimates 100 hours of initial desk research for 300 gap buildings at 20 minutes each. Dividing the work among four representatives gives 75 buildings and 25 hours per representative. Schedule visits and selling work separately.
Why do the building estimates use a 2018 reference year?
The calculation uses published CBECS size and regional tables for a consistent physical baseline. Methodology retains that reference year and its December 2022 revision. Current territory decisions use dated local building evidence and account confirmation alongside the baseline.
People also ask
Sources checked
- EIA CBECS Table B1: summary totals 2018 data, revised December 2022. Cross-checks national and regional building counts and floor area against B6 and B7.
- EIA CBECS Table B6: building size and counts 2018 data, revised December 2022. Supplies national and regional totals and the five size bands above 25,000 sq ft.
- EIA CBECS Table B7: building size and floor area 2018 data, revised December 2022. Supplies national and regional floor-area totals and upper size-band floor area.
- EIA: About CBECS Undated scope reference, reviewed November 2026. Establishes the commercial-building survey universe; no numeric estimate input.
- EIA: 2018 CBECS terminology 2018 glossary, accessed November 2026. Supports building, floor-area and excluded-use definitions.
- Census: About County Business Patterns Accessed November 2026. Employer-establishment coverage, geography and industry context; no CBP count is substituted for buildings.
- Census: County Business Patterns methodology Accessed November 2026. Defines an establishment as a business location and explains industry and geographic treatment; no numeric model input.
- PorchRocket Ground Control Live offer checked November 2026. Standard commercial-building filters, $10 to $20 per building and delivery within 48 hours after payment. The $15 central model price is the midpoint.
- PorchRocket Asset Search Live offer checked November 2026. Custom visible-asset searches and monitoring with owner of record; quoted per scope without a standard dollar price.