Electrical
Are VFD bearing currents causing fluting? Measure and verify the remedy
Distinguish electrical erosion from lubrication damage, map the current path, and retain matched waveforms that verify the correction.
Direct answer
VFD bearing currents are a strong suspect when a motor has fluted raceways; confirm the cause with bearing examination, operating shaft-voltage waveforms and a mapped current path. Measure shaft-to-frame voltage on a warmed, running motor with a suitable contact probe and oscilloscope, then repeat after correction at matched speed, load and drive settings. Verify suppression of the implicated discharge pattern and check the return path, because lower shaft voltage alone does not establish that current has stopped crossing a bearing.
On this page
Are VFD bearing currents causing this fluting?Where does the current go?Is it electrical erosion or lubrication damage?How do you prepare a safe, repeatable shaft test?What bandwidth, probe and capture settings do you need?How do you measure shaft voltage in the field?Which waveforms indicate discharge, and what voltage is too high?Can you measure actual bearing current?Which remedy fits the measured current path?How do you verify shaft grounding after installation?What should the before-and-after waveform record contain?Worked example: what does the published compressor remedy show?How much time should diagnosis and verification take?How often should the remedy be rechecked?Sources, review date and how to cite this pageOpen the related tool for the calculation, checklist, or packet.
FieldOS by AnvilfieldOffline-first FieldOS for job photos, proof packets, property memory, calculations, teams, billing, and owner-ready reports.Are VFD bearing currents causing this fluting?
Separate bearing condition, present electrical exposure and remedy performance. A replacement bearing can be quiet while discharge continues; a protected bearing can remain noisy from existing damage. Assign electrical correction and mechanical repair separate dispositions.
ISO 15243:2017, edition 2, classifies rolling-bearing damage by appearance and possible causes; its public abstract calls for further investigation when appearance cannot reliably establish the cause. It is not a shaft-voltage acceptance standard. SKF's September 2011 maintenance handbook also identifies electrical erosion from flux asymmetry and process or belt static charging, so establish when failures began relative to drive conversion and service changes.
ISO public scope; SKF handbook, pp. 319 to 322.
What turns a suspicion into a supported diagnosis?
Preserve tagged bearing photographs, orientation and lubrication history, operating shaft traces, and a drawing of the likely loop. A sharp voltage collapse supports a discharge mechanism, while craters and melted features support electrical erosion in the bearing. Correlating operating history and current path connects those findings; an external shaft trace alone does not identify which internal bearing discharged.
| Evidence state | Bearing evidence | Operating evidence | Finding/action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suspected electrical cause | Reported fluting/frosting | VFD, no valid trace | Preserve bearing; capture traces. ABB/SKF/NSK. |
| Active discharge supported | Teardown unavailable | Repeatable charge/collapse; valid contact | Trace loop; test remedy. ABB/Fluke. |
| Electrical erosion supported | Melted craters, possible corrugation | No operating record | Record erosion; test repaired machine. SKF/NSK. |
| VFD attribution supported | Documented electrical erosion | Discharge plus plausible drive-related path | Correct path; matched retest. Anvilfield synthesis. |
| Mechanical cause supported | Smearing, fretting or abnormal loading | No corroborating electrical finding in tested window | Correct documented cause; retain baseline. SKF/NSK. |
| Remedy documented | Condition recorded | Matched traces/path checks meet equipment criterion | Close electrical correction; retain mechanical follow-up. Anvilfield reporting rule. |
Where does the current go?
ABB Technical guide No. 5, Rev C (2011), distinguishes capacitive discharge, circulating bearing current and shaft-grounding current, so a remedy must address the identified loop rather than shaft voltage alone. A grounded frame still permits capacitive shaft charging. Record bearing insulation and shaft-grounding hardware separately from the motor's inverter-duty winding rating.
A variable frequency drive controls motor speed; the PWM drives discussed here switch their output in rapid voltage pulses. Common-mode voltage is the average of the phase voltages relative to the reference, which can change even while the commanded motor speed stays steady. High-frequency (HF) return impedance determines which available paths carry its fast switching currents. The distinction between frame bonding and shaft grounding follows the separate circuits explained in grounding versus bonding.
Three loops the field drawing must distinguish
Capacitive coupling charges the shaft; discharge crosses a bearing to the frame and returns toward the inverter. A brush provides a parallel branch. Circulating current follows the shaft, both bearings and frame, so a brush alone need not interrupt that loop.
In the driven-equipment loop, elevated motor-frame potential drives current through the motor bearing, shaft, conductive coupling and load bearing toward the inverter return. Include pump, gearbox and encoder branches on the site drawing. A frame equalizing bond and bearing insulation change different parts of that circuit.
Label the test points before choosing a remedy
Mark TP1 at the drive-end (DE) shaft-to-frame point, TP2 at the non-drive end (NDE), and TP3 between motor and driven frames. Add accessible brush branches and any specialist test jumper to the job drawing. Label inaccessible paths explicitly; a brush-current reading measures that branch, not the internal bearing.
Keep the cable/shield arrangement with the VFD installation and commissioning record. Record drive-fed operation and any bypass operation separately using the actual motor starting methods.
Is it electrical erosion or lubrication damage?
Fluting, dark grease, noise and a hot housing justify investigation; none alone proves VFD attribution. Electrical erosion can degrade lubricant and produce secondary fatigue alongside lubrication damage.
Before cleaning, preserve grease and orientation and photograph both rings, rolling elements, load tracks, seals and fit surfaces. SKF's Bearing maintenance handbook, PUB SR/P7 10001/1 EN (September 2011), shows current-leakage craters at 500× and 1,000× magnification and describes thermally altered material in cross section. Use laboratory examination when ordinary magnification cannot distinguish the surface mechanisms. Preserve an unwashed lubricant sample and the least-damaged raceway areas; heavy spalling can erase the initiating damage.
What the damage pattern supports
| Suspected mechanism | Bearing/grease finding | Best confirming evidence | Corrective direction | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical erosion | Fine craters, melted/re-solidified features, frosting or corrugation | Microscopy plus operating discharge/path evidence | Suppress, divert or interrupt identified current path | S5 pp. 319 to 322; S6 |
| Insufficient film or smearing | Roughened/smeared surface and adhesive damage from sliding/film rupture | Lubricant, speed/load and clearance review | Correct lubricant delivery, operating duty and fit | S8, bearing failure section |
| Excess grease/heat | Elevated temperature following service, churning or degraded lubricant | Measured grease dose, relief condition and temperature trend | Restore OEM amount and procedure | S8; existing lubrication guide for context |
| False brinelling | Depressions/wear at repeated rolling-element positions | Standstill vibration, transport or small oscillation history | Correct vibration/restraint/lubrication arrangement | S7 |
| Particle contamination | Dents, abrasive wear and damaged film | Clean sample and sealing/handling evidence | Remove contamination source, restore sealing and lubricant | S5; S8 |
| Moisture/corrosion | Rust, discoloration and corrosion pits | Water ingress, storage and seal evidence | Correct moisture path and bearing condition | S8 |
| Misalignment/abnormal loading | Displaced or abnormal raceway load pattern, secondary spalling | Alignment, belt load, housing and shaft fit measurements | Correct alignment/load/fit to machine tolerances | S5; S8 |
| Secondary fatigue after electrical damage | Spalling obscures earlier fine features | Examine less-damaged surfaces and earlier records | Address electrical mechanism and replace damaged parts | S5; S6 |
NSK Electrical Erosion describes local melting and crater-like depressions; NSK False Brinelling connects repeated contact-position damage with vibration and small oscillations, including transport. NSK Handling Instructions for Bearings, copyright 2010 supplies the broader mechanical differential.
Compare spacing and surface texture. False brinelling follows repeated rolling-element contact positions; electrical fluting develops from erosion and rolling contact. Seek crater or melt evidence when transport vibration and poor lubrication are also plausible.
What heat and vibration add
Vibration trends establish deterioration and its rate; thermal images record housing temperature at measured load and ambient conditions. Neither measures bearing discharge. Use electrical thermography inspection for the thermal record.
A damaged bearing still needs a mechanical disposition under the machine's established alarm settings, deterioration rate and failure consequence. A low shaft-voltage result does not authorize continued operation of a spalling bearing. Use motor bearing lubrication and shaft grounding for grease amount, interval and service procedure after identifying the damage mechanism.
How do you prepare a safe, repeatable shaft test?
Stop and isolate the machine before preparing the shaft, attaching the probe or changing its position. Secure the brush and leads, establish guarding, and operate the recorder outside the rotating-parts hazard area. Helwig's BPK-Probe V2 guide warns that even a smooth, slowly rotating shaft can catch clothing or skin; PPE does not replace guarding.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.333(a)(1), July 1, 2025 edition, requires deenergizing exposed live parts unless its stated exceptions apply; subsection (c)(2) limits work on energized circuit parts or equipment to qualified persons. Subsections (b)(2)(ii) and (iv) require isolation from electrical sources, control of stored energy and verification of the deenergized condition. A drive stop command or interlock alone is not isolation; follow the actual drive's capacitor-discharge instructions and the site's electrical lockout procedure.
For machine servicing covered by OSHA 1910.147, July 1, 2025 edition, subsection (f)(1) governs temporary energization for testing: clear tools and materials, remove employees from the machine area, remove energy controls under the prescribed procedure, test, then deenergize and reapply controls before further servicing. OSHA 1910.212(a)(1), the same edition, requires guarding against rotating-part hazards. If guarded access cannot be arranged, record that shaft end as inaccessible and plan another measurement arrangement.
Use manufacturer-approved isolated inputs or a suitably rated differential probe where the reference connections require them. Shared oscilloscope ground clips can connect frames together and bypass an insulated path; map every channel return before connection. Tektronix's floating-measurement safety brief prohibits defeating oscilloscope protective grounding. Keep connections within the probe's and instrument's voltage, category and isolation ratings.
Helwig operating guide; OSHA electrical work practices; OSHA energy-control testing sequence; OSHA guarding; Fluke instrument and setup instructions.
Pretest asset and operating record
Read the motor nameplate and record model, serial, kW/hp, voltage, current and nominal speed. Add bearing IDs and insulation, coupling and driven machine, drive model and firmware, switching settings, output frequency, cable type and routed length. These identify which manufacturer application instructions govern the remedy.
Fluke's September 2018 MDA manual calls for a motor at normal operating temperature; ABB TG5 Rev C requires at least 10% nominal speed for its bearing-current measurement method so the bearings rise on the oil film. Record actual speed, load indication, housing temperatures and time since start. Thermal stabilization and minimum measurement speed are separate conditions.
What bandwidth, probe and capture settings do you need?
EST Q&A Part 16 gives the shaft-voltage bandwidth recommendation below. Select the measurement chain for the event: analog bandwidth determines which frequencies reach the recorder, actual sample rate sets sample spacing, and memory length determines capture duration. Record the rate used at the selected timebase.
| Item | Setting/capability | Application and authority |
|---|---|---|
| Shaft-voltage bandwidth | EST Q&A Part 16 (2021) recommends at least 100 MHz oscilloscope bandwidth. | Use a suitable shaft contact probe; retain the effective bandwidth of the complete chain. |
| AEGIS probe/coupling | 10:1; DC | AEGIS ed. 4 (2024); physical/channel ratios agree. |
| MDA-550 capability | 500 MHz; up to 5 Gsample/s | Fluke application note; save actual rate. |
| Specialist current chain | Minimum 10 kHz to 2 MHz | ABB TG5 Rev C (2011), p. 19; defined accessible path. |
| Current dynamic range | Peak capability of at least 150 to 200 A; sensitivity down to 10 mA RMS | ABB TG5 p. 19; capability, not motor readings. |
| Frame/shaft contact | Short local frame return; continuous conductive contact | Fluke 2018/AEGIS ed. 4; fixed holder, photograph. |
| Capture metadata | V/div, time/div, rate, memory, trigger, mode, bandwidth, attenuation | Anvilfield record rule; save calibration/compensation status. |
| Coverage | Observation window, acquired duration, known dead time, event definition | Fluke p. 33; indicated rate is not complete count. |
| Grounding simulator | Off for baseline/final | Helwig V2 guide; label simulator-on trial separately. |
Shaft-voltage instrument checklist
Compensate the probe as instructed and keep the brush clear of keyways. Record contact and setup photographs with the checklist settings.
Follow the exact probe assembly instructions: Fluke's September 2018 manual removes the specified tip sleeve for its brush, while AEGIS Handbook edition 4 (2024), p. 31, retains the PP510 insulated sleeve. Save a broad PWM view and a close view of event edges. Identify clipping and noise floor; a visually vertical edge does not establish a numerical transition time.
AEGIS edition 4; Fluke application note.
For current measurements, specify sensor, transfer ratio, recorder and accessible conductor together. Verify pulse range and noise floor; the current-chain figures above are instrument capabilities.
How do you measure shaft voltage in the field?
Capture the drive end, then the accessible non-drive end, and repeat at each declared duty point before and after correction. Verify brush contact in ordinary waveform view before relying on an event display. Save maximum, minimum and peak-to-peak separately: for an asymmetric trace, Vpp is maximum minus minimum and is not automatically twice its positive peak.
Fluke's September 2018 manual describes approximately 20 seconds before the event-rate reading appears; its specifications call that rate indicative. Record the configured voltage-change and transition-time definition with events/second. An empty EVENTS display is not a flat zero-voltage waveform: return to ordinary waveform view to confirm acquisition and contact.
Use matched duty points and an explicit observation window
Anvilfield's proposed sampling plan uses normal low, operating and high duty points permitted by the process, with three 60-second observation windows at each accessible end after stabilization. Retain repeated short high-speed captures during those windows and repeat the matrix after correction. Record any unavailable duty point as untested operating coverage.
Anvilfield estimates 36 minutes of observation for two ends, three duty points, three windows and before/after testing: 2 × 3 × 3 × 60 × 2 seconds, divided by 60. This method counts observation only; setup, warm-up, transitions and reporting extend the assignment. Retain the actual captured duration and known trigger dead time separately from observation time.
Divide record length by actual sample rate to obtain acquired duration. Anvilfield estimates that a selected 1-million-sample record at 1 Gsample/s covers 1 ms, while continuous recording for 60 seconds at that rate requires 60 billion samples per channel. This calculation multiplies selected sample rate by duration and explains why a minute watching the display is not a minute of saved high-speed data.
Disable the BPK embedded grounding simulator for the untreated baseline and final permanent-hardware test, following Helwig's operating guide. Store a simulator-on comparison as its own test state. Change one item at a time during diagnostic trials; when several repairs are installed together, attribute the result to the repair package.
Fluke manual, pp. 22, 23 and 33; Helwig simulator instructions.
Which waveforms indicate discharge, and what voltage is too high?
Read waveform shape before assigning meaning to amplitude. The AEGIS ranges below describe typical patterns, not universal acceptance limits. Common-mode steps show shaft excitation, while repeated charge-and-collapse patterns support electrical discharge machining (EDM). When the lubricant film breaks down, an arc locally melts the contact surface, leaving the craters described by NSK. Check apparent collapse events against switching edges, brush bounce, reference-lead pickup and clipping; repeat with verified contact and consistent geometry before assigning them to a bearing.
Fluke's MDA-550/MDA-510 Users Manual (September 2018) identifies shaft-voltage changes above 15 V with transition times below 50 ns as possible grease flashover indicators and states that no fixed voltage defines bearing damage for every motor.
| Source/application | Published value | Waveform or context | Field interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| AEGIS Handbook ed. 4, 2024, p. 30 | Typically 20 to 120 Vpp | Common-mode stepped/square waveform | Shaft charge is present; that trace need not show a discharge |
| Same | Typically 20 to 80 Vpp | High-amplitude EDM charge/collapse | Investigate active discharge and its path |
| Same | Typically 4 to 15 Vpp | Lower-amplitude continuous discharge | Low voltage alone does not establish protection |
| Same | Typically 2 to 10 Vpp on bare steel with AEGIS installed | Grounded-shaft waveform | Product-specific typical observation; retain event/path evidence |
| Helwig Pocket Guide GDE-009/2023, p. 3 | Common mode measured at 2 V or higher | Manufacturer risk statement; amplitude basis not specified there | Preserve Helwig's metric and test method; do not call it a universal 2 Vpp limit |
| EST blog, 9 January 2024 | Below 5 V peak / 10 Vpp as its general rule | Vendor's amplitude guidance with discharge inspection | Compare waveform shape as well; asymmetric traces need direct peak/Vpp reporting |
Why lower shaft voltage can accompany a damaged bearing
The low-amplitude discharge pattern in the AEGIS comparison can accompany lubricant whose impedance has fallen, allowing more continuous conduction. Carbon and metal contamination can create that lower-impedance condition. Speed, load, temperature and film condition also change the circuit.
AEGIS edition 4, p. 30; Helwig Pocket Guide GDE-009/2023; EST resistance article, January 9, 2024.
Can you measure actual bearing current?
Direct internal bearing-current measurement normally requires an isolated or modified bearing path or a purpose-designed test arrangement; ABB TG5 Rev C cautions that it is unavailable on a standard motor. A current probe on a brush conductor measures diverted brush current. Identify the enclosed path, sensor bandwidth, transfer ratio, polarity and range on every saved trace.
Zero signal in one frame bond does not clear parallel paths, and drive protective-earth current is not a direct bearing-current reading. Expand the test scope when damage recurs despite sound brush contact, the two motor ends disagree, a circulating loop is suspected, or pump, gearbox or encoder bearings remain exposed.
When the shaft-voltage result needs a specialist current-path test
The manufacturer-authored ASHRAE Transactions 114(2) paper SL-08-025 (2008), Figure 6, describes isolated bearings in a 5 hp, 460 V, three-phase test motor and reports 7 V peak shaft voltage with no measurable bearing current after microfiber grounding. The published detection limit is unspecified. The test distinguishes remaining shaft voltage from measured bearing current.
Which remedy fits the measured current path?
Start with the installation's high-frequency return circuit. ABB TG5 Rev C (2011), pp. 17 to 18, calls for 360° shield connections at both ends and describes 50 to 100 mm wide copper braid for high-frequency potential equalization. These are installation practices separate from required protective-earth sizing.
A brush diverts current, insulation interrupts a selected loop and a common-mode filter reduces excitation. Correct damaged bearings, alignment and lubricant problems identified in the same investigation.
Compare the mechanisms before comparing products
| Remedy | Function and fit | Limitation | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symmetric cable; 360° shielding | Controls HF return impedance | PE alone does not prove HF performance | Photos and matched shaft/path traces. ABB TG5. |
| Short, wide frame bond | Equalizes motor/load potentials | Long/round connections have HF impedance | Frame and implicated-loop retest. ABB TG5. |
| Grounding ring/brush | Diverts capacitive shaft current | Contact/contamination; circulating loop can remain | Both ends and diversion path. Helwig/AEGIS. |
| Insulated/coated bearing | Interrupts selected bearing loop | HF impedance, bypasses, coupled equipment | Arrangement and loop checks. ABB. |
| Hybrid ceramic-element bearing | Raises rolling-element impedance | Other excitation/paths remain | Motor and driven equipment. ABB/SKF. |
| Common-mode filter | Reduces common-mode excitation | Application, rating and mounting | Matched path/shaft tests. ABB. |
| dV/dt/sine filter; parameter change | Alters output excitation | Phase-voltage improvement alone is insufficient | Electrical/duty/temperature retest. ABB/Fluke. |
| Lubrication/alignment correction | Restores mechanical condition | Does not establish electrical protection | Mechanical trends; implicated electrical retest. SKF/NSK. |
Specify the filter's intended function and its motor, drive and cable application. A line-side harmonic reactor or improved phase-voltage trace does not establish bearing-current mitigation. Keep harmonics and power quality results separate from the shaft/path verification.
Where manufacturers differ and which instruction controls
| Document | Application | Published approach | Selection check |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABB 9AKK105944 EN 10-2025, p. 15 | Process-performance motors/ABB drives, below 100 kW | No additional bearing-current measure in small-power row | Higher frame category overrides; retain earthing/cabling. |
| Same | ≥100 kW or IEC 315 through 355 | Insulated NDE bearing | Apply higher power/frame category. |
| Same | ≥350 kW or IEC 400 through 500 | Insulated NDE plus converter common-mode filter | Keep both measures. |
| Same | Persistent currents after prescribed measures | Both-end insulation, variant 702 | Bearing/series/frame restrictions; verify coupled paths. |
| AEGIS ed. 4 (2024), pp. 16 to 17 | Low-voltage induction, through 75 kW, within SGR envelope | One SGR ring | General radial-ball-bearing example; separate thrust guidance. |
| Same | Above 75 kW within SGR envelope | One bearing isolated; opposite-end SGR | Check voltage, duty and ring family. |
| Same, pp. 16, 19 | SGR: through 375 kW, ≤600 VAC; PRO: ≥225 kW continuous, ≥375 kW intermittent, or ≥600 V | PRO with opposite-end insulation for applicable duty | Overlapping scopes, including 600 V: obtain manufacturer selection. |
| Helwig GDE-009/2023 | Shaft-voltage screening/BPK | BPK typically reduces measured voltage below 1 V; screening guidance appears in the waveform table | Keep source metric; verify waveform. |
Follow the installed motor/drive and accessory instructions; resolve incompatible configurations with the supplier. These manufacturer boundaries serve different applications.
ABB's both-end insulation option requires the actual motor-series option table: the October 2025 catalog lists variant 702 unavailable across the table on p. 55 and available for frames 100 through 250 in the table on p. 61. Keep special drive-end roller or angular-contact bearings and vertical thrust arrangements separate from the general radial-ball-bearing example. Verify the coupled equipment after any insulation change.
How do you verify shaft grounding after installation?
Test the permanent remedy at the baseline temperature, speed, load and drive settings. Establish conductive shaft contact and mount conductivity before interpreting a low reading. Retest both motor ends and any driven-machine path identified in the diagnosis; a good result beside the brush does not clear a remote bearing.
Why an ohmmeter reading does not close the job
EST's January 9, 2024 resistance article explains that operating high-frequency performance cannot be inferred from static ring resistance alone. Continuity checks locate gross open connections; operating waveforms establish protection under the tested conditions.
When the final trace remains poor, stop and isolate before checking for paint beneath the mount, shaft coating or corrosion, loose connections, damaged fibers or brush wear, and accidental bypasses around insulated bearings. Follow the installed accessory instructions for surface preparation and attachment. Correct contact defects and repeat the original measurement before changing the remedy design.
Accept, repeat or reopen the diagnosis
Set the acceptance criterion before repair: identify the equipment instruction, its peak or Vpp metric, and the required locations and duty matrix. Where no OEM numerical criterion exists, agree a project criterion combining valid contact, suppression of the implicated discharge pattern and verification of the identified return path. A percentage voltage reduction alone is insufficient.
Accept when the equipment-specific criterion is met, implicated discharge behavior is suppressed in the declared windows and accessible adjacent-bearing exposure has been checked. Record an untested required path as incomplete. Repeat invalid captures after correcting contact, attenuation, references or operating differences; reopen the loop diagnosis when discharge persists with a sound installation.
What should the before-and-after waveform record contain?
Complete one paired record for each shaft end and duty point. Record the measured values in the fields below and attach native data, screenshots and setup photos. “Not accessed” and “not recorded” remain incomplete coverage.
| Record field | Before correction | After correction |
|---|---|---|
| Asset and point | Motor/drive/load IDs; DE or NDE; probe/reference positions | Same IDs and points; list replacements |
| Duty | Speed rpm; output/carrier Hz; load indication; housing °C | Repeat values; explain mismatches |
| Voltage | Maximum V; minimum V; Vpp; waveform pattern | Same metrics and acquisition settings |
| Acquisition | Scope/probe IDs; ratio; coupling; bandwidth Hz; samples/s; samples; trigger/mode | Repeat settings; calibration/compensation status |
| Coverage | Observation seconds; acquired seconds; known dead time; event definition and indicated rate | Same coverage and definition; record unavailable duty |
| Contact and test state | Setup photo; brush contact check; simulator off; existing hardware | Photo; permanent remedy; simulator off |
| Current path | Circuit sketch; measured branch; sensor ratio, range, bandwidth and polarity | Updated sketch; diverted current; adjacent paths checked |
| Files | Native trace and screenshot names; V/div and time/div | Paired trace names; retain unclipped data |
| Mechanical condition | Bearing images; lubricant, vibration and temperature history | Bearing work; remaining mechanical disposition |
| Decision | Equipment-specific criterion and required test coverage | Accept, repeat or incomplete; reviewer role; next trigger |
The field closeout checklist
Archive this package with the MCC commissioning and machine turnover records.
- Resolve missing motor, drive, bearing and coupled-equipment IDs.
- Preserve bearing orientation, grease and pre-cleaning photographs.
- Record lubrication, alignment, seal and failure history.
- Draw the suspected loop and mark the measured branch.
- Isolate for setup; secure guarding, probe and leads.
- Verify conductive shaft contact and the local frame reference.
- Check attenuation, compensation, bandwidth and acquisition settings.
- Record warm operating conditions and drive settings.
- Save broad and edge-detail traces; keep the simulator off.
- Record observation time, acquired duration and known dead time.
- Identify current-sensor path, ratio, range, bandwidth and polarity.
- Record remedy hardware, bearing work and instructions followed.
- Repeat the operating matrix and adjacent-path checks.
- Apply the agreed criterion; repeat invalid captures and flag incomplete coverage.
- Archive traces, photos, disposition and next inspection trigger.
Worked example: what does the published compressor remedy show?
Helwig Carbon's CSE-414 compressor case reports a substantial shaft-voltage decrease and no subsequent bearing trouble at its reported follow-up after a combined bearing replacement and grounding-kit repair. The manufacturer supplies a damaged-bearing photograph, instrument readings and a later oscilloscope image.
| Input or result | Value | Provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment | Two Siemens motors, 243 hp each; GA180 VSD-FF compressors | Helwig CSE-414 |
| History | Bearing failures almost yearly | Helwig; no run-hour series |
| Immediate shaft-voltage comparison | 6.3 V before; below 1 V after | Helwig describes this comparison as peak voltage |
| Repair package | New bearings plus BPK-4 kits inside motor fan covers | Helwig installation account |
| Calculated reduction | Greater than 5.3 V and greater than 84% | Anvilfield estimates from the immediate readings |
| Follow-up | Installed in 2018; February 2020 image; below 1 V peak-to-peak and no subsequent bearing trouble reported | Helwig follow-up account |
| Measurement coverage | Matched duty, raw paired traces, microscopy and operating hours not provided | Source disclosure |
Check the reduction
Method: subtract the upper bound of the final reading from the baseline, divide by the baseline, and multiply by 100. Anvilfield estimates the percentage bound from (6.3 − 1) ÷ 6.3 × 100, rounded down to a whole percent; the actual final reading was below the value used in that calculation.
Keep the source's immediate peak-voltage comparison and later peak-to-peak reading in separate dated records. Add operating conditions, contact checks and current-path evidence using the paired field form.
How much time should diagnosis and verification take?
Anvilfield estimates 2 to 8 elapsed hours, or 4 to 16 person-hours for a two-person team, for an accessible-motor diagnostic assignment including baseline testing, matched retesting and reporting. Use the larger allowance for more duty points or current-path investigation. Schedule remedy installation, bearing replacement and extended shutdown waiting separately.
| Diagnostic scope | Elapsed allowance | Person-hours | Included work |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accessible single-duty comparison | 2 hours | 4 | Setup, baseline/retest captures and short record |
| Both-end, multi-duty comparison | 4 hours | 8 | Matched operating matrix and annotated report |
| Extended access/path investigation | 8 hours | 16 | Additional accessible-path measurements and reporting |
Method: these November 5, 2026 Anvilfield estimates multiply assigned people by elapsed hours. The team size and task durations are planning inputs. Add time for guard modifications, warm-up beyond the visit allowance, process transitions, travel and repeat mobilization; an internal bearing-current test needs its own engineered scope.
Build the work order around the evidence package
Assign baseline diagnosis, remedy installation and matched verification as explicit tasks. Identify who supplies operating access, who changes bearings or filters, and who accepts the final electrical record. Keep production outage time separate from technician time.
Manufacturing service programs group motors by failure consequence, repair history, drive conversion and practical shaft access, then obtain the equipment inventory from the operator. Service managers use PorchRocket Ground Control to select manufacturing buildings by business type and building size when defining a motor-diagnostics territory.
How often should the remedy be rechecked?
Retest at correction commissioning; for a critical-motor program, Anvilfield estimates a first follow-up at 30 days and quarterly reviews until stable site history supports another interval. These are program planning intervals, adjusted to the installed equipment instructions and failure consequence. Method: the first month checks service exposure; quarterly reviews build a first-year record alongside the condition route.
Retest early after motor/bearing replacement, drive/cable/filter or coupling changes, disturbed grounding hardware, contamination or new vibration/temperature trends. Compare archived traces and teardown findings when failures recur.
AEGIS Handbook edition 4 (2024), p. 14, describes the ring as requiring no maintenance while requiring a conductive shaft and recommending a new ring when bearings are replaced. Helwig's GDE-009/2023 guide also describes its BPK as maintenance-free. Inspect conductivity and attachment when the condition route or service work exposes the assembly, following the installed product's instructions.
Sources, review date and how to cite this page
By Anvilfield. Reviewed November 5, 2026. Sources checked: manufacturer manuals, damage references and the official OSHA texts below; ISO scope and status checked through its public page. Handbook edition 4 governs the AEGIS comparison; edition 3 is retained as a cross-check.
- S1: ABB, Technical guide No. 5, Rev C, April 27, 2011, in Technical Guide Book Rev I (2016).
- S2: ABB, IEC low-voltage Process performance motors, 9AKK105944 EN 10-2025, pp. 15, 55, 61.
- S3: Fluke, MDA-550/MDA-510 Users Manual, September 2018, pp. 21 to 23, 33.
- S4: ISO 15243:2017, edition 2, public abstract and status; confirmed 2022.
- S5: SKF, Bearing maintenance handbook, PUB SR/P7 10001/1 EN, September 2011, pp. 319 to 322.
- S6: NSK, Electrical Erosion, undated manufacturer page.
- S7: NSK, False Brinelling, undated manufacturer page.
- S8: NSK, Handling Instructions for Bearings, copyright 2010; document reference HIB/C/E/07.21.
- S9: Electro Static Technology, Electrical Bearing Protection Q&A, Part 16, October 5, 2021.
- S10: Helwig Carbon, BPK-Probe V2 Operating Guide, undated, seven pages.
- S11: Electro Static Technology, Industrial Bearing Protection Handbook, edition 4, 2024; manufacturer PDF hosted by HSA.
- S12: Fluke, Measuring motor shaft voltage discharges with Fluke MDA-550, undated application note.
- S13: ASHRAE Transactions 114(2), SL-08-025, 2008, Shaft Grounding: A Solution to Motor Bearing Currents; manufacturer-authored paper.
- S14: Electro Static Technology, AEGIS Rings' Resistance Isn't Everything, January 9, 2024.
- S15: OSHA, 29 CFR 1910.333, July 1, 2025 annual CFR edition, official text.
- S16: Helwig Carbon, Saving Compressor Motor Bearings, CSE-414, undated; February 2020 follow-up image.
- S17: Helwig Carbon, BPK Pocket Guide, GDE-009/2023.
- S18: Electro Static Technology, AEGIS Shaft Voltage Testing, handbook edition 3 extract, copyright 2018; cross-check.
- S19: OSHA, 29 CFR 1910.147, July 1, 2025 annual CFR edition, especially (f)(1), testing or positioning.
- S20: OSHA, 29 CFR 1910.212, July 1, 2025 annual CFR edition, (a)(1), machine guarding.
- S21: Tektronix, Floating Oscilloscope Measurements and Operator Protection, 51W-10640-1, November 1998.
Update log, 2026-11-05: Rechecked primary sources; expanded isolation and guarded testing; clarified damage discrimination and manufacturer selection; added paired waveform fields; consolidated the compressor calculation and labor-hour planning.
Citable units: current-path diagram; probe bandwidth checklist; bearing damage differential; remedy comparison; post-remedy waveform record. Cite the unit name and reviewed date with the page citation.
How to cite this page: Anvilfield, Are VFD bearing currents causing fluting? Measure and verify the remedy, 2026, https://anvilfield.com/field-guides/electrical/vfd-bearing-current-fluting-diagnosis/
FAQ
How do you measure VFD bearing currents and verify the remedy?
Measure operating shaft voltage and accessible suspected current paths, then repeat matched tests after correction. Retain waveforms, setup details and the current-path drawing with the acceptance decision.
Is shaft voltage the same as bearing current?
No. Shaft-to-frame voltage is a potential difference. Direct bearing current requires a defined measured current path; a brush-conductor probe measures current in that brush branch.
How can you tell VFD fluting from lubrication failure?
Combine crater and melt evidence with lubrication history, operating waveforms and path analysis. The damage differential separates electrical erosion, false brinelling, smearing and contamination.
What oscilloscope bandwidth is needed for shaft voltage testing?
Electro Static Technology's Q&A Part 16 (2021) recommends at least 100 MHz oscilloscope bandwidth. Use a suitable shaft contact probe and record actual acquisition settings; specialist current-path measurements require their own sensor and recorder specification.
Can a multimeter verify shaft grounding?
A multimeter cannot resolve the fast discharge waveform or establish high-frequency protection from static resistance alone. Retain an operating waveform with proven brush contact and a valid frame reference.
Is shaft voltage below 2 V always safe?
No. Use the manufacturer's amplitude metric and test method, then examine discharge behavior and the current path. The waveform table compares the published guidance.
Does an inverter-duty motor need separate bearing-current protection?
An inverter-duty winding rating does not establish bearing protection. Apply the motor/drive bearing-current instructions to the actual bearing arrangement, frame, power and duty.
Does a shaft grounding ring stop circulating bearing currents?
A ring provides a diversion path. A circulating loop can also require bearing insulation or common-mode reduction; select the remedy from the identified circuit.
Can insulated bearings move the problem into a pump or gearbox?
Changing bearing impedance can redirect current through coupled equipment. Check exposed pump, gearbox and encoder paths after the change.
Will shaft grounding repair an already fluted bearing?
No. Grounding addresses the electrical path; damaged bearings still need condition-based repair or replacement and continued vibration and temperature monitoring.
People also ask
Codes cited in this guide
This guide is written and reviewed against the published standards below. Always confirm the current adopted edition with the authority having jurisdiction.