Low-slope membrane selection: TPO vs EPDM vs PVC for commercial roofs

There is no single best membrane, and why that matters

Ask which low-slope single-ply membrane is best and the honest answer is that the question is wrong. TPO, PVC, and EPDM each win in a specific set of conditions, and the right pick comes from the building, not from a brand or a salesman's favorite line. The variables that decide it are the chemical exposure on the roof, how the membrane is attached, the climate, the budget, and the warranty the owner actually needs. Match those to the membrane and the choice makes itself.

Most bad roofs do not fail because the membrane was bad. They fail because the wrong membrane went on the wrong building. PVC put on a tight budget where EPDM would have done the job for less. TPO put on a restaurant roof where the grease cooked it in eight years. EPDM put on a building that needed a cool roof to pass the energy code. The material was fine. The selection was the failure.

So treat this as a decision, not a preference. The three single-ply membranes are all proven systems with decades of field history behind them, and any of the three can be the right roof. The skill is reading the building and knowing which one its conditions are asking for, then sizing the thickness and the attachment to the wind and the warranty. The rest of this guide is how to do that read.

The three chemistries: TPO, PVC, and EPDM

The three membranes split into two material families, and the family decides almost everything downstream. TPO and PVC are thermoplastics. They soften and re-melt with heat, which is what lets a hot-air welder fuse their seams into one continuous material. EPDM is a thermoset rubber. It is vulcanized, it does not re-melt, and its seams are made with tape and adhesive instead of a weld. That single distinction drives the seam, the repair, and a large part of the longevity story.

TPO, thermoplastic polyolefin, is the white reflective membrane that has taken the largest share of the new low-slope market. PVC, polyvinyl chloride, is the older thermoplastic and the chemical-resistance leader, the membrane that holds up to grease and industrial exposure that degrades the other two. EPDM, ethylene propylene diene monomer, is the rubber roof, usually black, with the longest field track record and the best cold flexibility of the three.

Each one leads in something real. PVC leads on chemical and grease resistance. EPDM leads on longevity, cold flexibility, and a fifty-year installed history you can go look at. TPO leads on reflectivity at a moderate cost, which is why it dominates the cool-roof market. None of them leads on everything, and the marketing that says otherwise is selling, not specifying.

How do the seams differ, and why it decides the roof?

TPO and PVC seams are hot-air welded; EPDM seams are taped. On a single-ply roof the field of the sheet almost never leaks. The seams, the flashings, and the penetrations do, so the way a membrane seams is one of the most important things about it. A welded thermoplastic seam fuses the two sheets into a single material, and a good one is stronger than the sheet itself. That is a real structural advantage, and it is why the seam QA on a welded roof is its own discipline, covered in the companion guide on single-ply seam inspection.

EPDM cannot be welded, because thermoset rubber does not re-melt. Its seams are made with a butyl splice tape and a primer that activates the bond between the two cured rubber surfaces. The bond is an adhesive bond, not a fusion, so it is only as good as the prep and the rolling pressure behind it. The historic weak point of EPDM roofs was exactly here. The older liquid-adhesive seams failed long before the field of the sheet ever wore out, and seam failure was the reputation EPDM had to climb out of.

Modern EPDM splice tape is a large improvement over the old adhesives, and a properly primed and rolled tape seam holds. But the principle stands. A welded TPO or PVC seam lives or dies on the weld settings and the operator, while an EPDM tape seam lives or dies on the cleaning, the primer, and the roller. Neither is foolproof. They just fail in different ways, and you inspect them differently.

What membrane do you use for a restaurant or grease roof?

For a roof with kitchen exhaust, grease, or chemical exposure, the answer is PVC, and it is not close. PVC is chemically resistant to animal fats, vegetable oils, and a long list of industrial chemicals. The chlorine in the polymer makes a dense, tightly bonded structure that grease cannot break down. On a restaurant roof, that is the whole ballgame, because the exhaust fans put a film of cooking grease on the membrane every day the kitchen runs.

TPO and EPDM lose this contest badly. TPO is specifically not resistant to animal fats and cooking oils. The grease attacks the polymer, the membrane softens and swells and loses tensile strength, and a TPO roof on a restaurant commonly fails in eight to twelve years, less than half its normal life. EPDM is worse with grease, not better, because the acidic compounds in cooking grease break down rubber readily. Put either one on a grease roof and you have built in the failure.

This is the cleanest membrane decision there is. If the roof has rooftop kitchen exhaust, a grease-laden discharge, or industrial chemical exposure, you specify PVC, full stop. Grease containment systems at the exhaust help, but they do not change the membrane decision, because no containment is perfect and the drift lands on the field. The exposure picks the membrane here, and the exposure is PVC's home field.

Is TPO or PVC more reflective than EPDM?

TPO and PVC are far more reflective than standard EPDM, because they are usually white and EPDM is usually black. A white TPO or PVC membrane comes off the roll reflective, with a solar reflectance index commonly above 90, and it holds most of that after several years of weathering. Standard black EPDM is the opposite. It absorbs sunlight and its SRI sits near the bottom of the scale. On a hot day, a black roof surface can run forty or more degrees hotter than a white one under the same sun.

That difference is why the cool-roof and energy-code question usually steers toward white. Many energy codes and rating programs set a minimum solar reflectance for low-slope roofs in warm climates, and the white thermoplastics meet it without a coating. EPDM can be had in white or with a reflective coating, but the base rubber is black, and the white versions cost more and are less common. If the project has a cool-roof requirement, the white membrane is the path of least resistance.

Black is not automatically wrong, though. In a cold northern climate, a black EPDM roof absorbs solar heat that helps melt snow and can cut winter heat loss, and the cooling penalty that hurts a white roof in the south barely applies. The white-versus-black call follows the climate. Reflective in the cooling-dominated south and in any building fighting an energy code, dark where heating dominates and snow load and ice are the real concern. Confirm the reflectance requirement against the adopted energy code and any rating program, because that is what controls it.

Which single-ply membrane lasts longest?

EPDM has the longest proven field track record of the three, which is a different claim than saying it always outlasts the others. Rubber roofs installed in the 1980s are still in service, and a well-installed EPDM membrane commonly performs 30 years or more, with some warranties now reaching well past that. The reason is in the chemistry. EPDM does not depend on plasticizers that can leave the membrane over time, so it ages slowly and stays flexible. When EPDM fails, it is usually the seams or a detail, not the field of the sheet.

TPO carries the weight of its own history. Early TPO formulations from the late 1990s and 2000s had real problems with premature cracking, surface crazing, and seam failures, and that reputation followed the product for years. Modern TPO is a different and much improved material, with reformulated UV stabilizers that addressed most of the early failures. The honest read is that today's TPO is a solid membrane, but the longest field data on current formulations is shorter than EPDM's, simply because the good versions are newer.

PVC ages through a mechanism worth understanding. PVC stays flexible because of plasticizers, and over decades those plasticizers can migrate out of the membrane. As they leave, the sheet loses elasticity, gets brittle, and becomes prone to cracking, especially in cold and especially if maintenance was deferred. Premium PVC formulations use plasticizers that resist migration far longer than the old ones, so this is a slower problem than it once was, but it is the way PVC reaches the end of its life. Across all three, installation quality and maintenance move the real lifespan more than the chemistry does, so treat these as tendencies and confirm the warranted term against the specific product.

Cold weather and flexibility

EPDM stays flexible in cold better than either thermoplastic, and in a deep-cold climate that matters. Rubber remains pliable at very low temperatures, with EPDM commonly cited as flexible down near minus 40 degrees F, so it tolerates the freeze-thaw cycling and the thermal movement of a northern winter without getting brittle. In Minnesota, the Dakotas, and the upper Midwest, EPDM often wins the lifecycle argument on cold flexibility alone.

The thermoplastics get stiffer in the cold, and that shows up two ways. A PVC membrane that has lost plasticizer over the years is most likely to crack in cold weather, because the cold and the plasticizer loss compound each other. And welding either thermoplastic in cold ambient conditions is harder, commonly a problem below about 40 degrees F without preheating, because the cold sheet pulls heat away from the weld. That is an installation constraint, not a service-life one, but it is real on a winter re-roof.

None of this makes a thermoplastic a bad cold-climate roof. They go on northern buildings every year and perform. It means EPDM has a genuine edge where cold flexibility is the governing concern, and that edge is one of the conditions that should pull the decision toward rubber.

Which single-ply membrane costs the least?

EPDM is generally the lowest material cost, PVC the highest, and TPO in between, though the ranges overlap enough that the order can flip on a given job. As a planning frame, recent installed figures put EPDM roughly in the range of 6 to 9 dollars per square foot, TPO around 7 to 10, and PVC around 8 to 12, with wide variation by region, roof complexity, and attachment. Treat those as ballpark, not quotes, and price the actual system for the actual roof.

The gap between TPO and PVC has narrowed over the past decade. TPO came to market partly as a cheaper alternative to PVC, but as TPO improved and demand rose, the price difference shrank, and on many jobs they now land close. That changes the calculus. When PVC costs only a little more than TPO, the chemical resistance and the longer thermoplastic track record can be worth the premium even on a roof without heavy grease exposure.

Material is only part of the installed cost, and usually the smaller part. Labor commonly runs the majority of the total, and the attachment method, the insulation, the tear-off, and the detail count move the number more than the membrane chemistry does. A fully adhered system costs more to install than a mechanically attached one regardless of which membrane is on top. So the cheapest membrane on the data sheet is not always the cheapest roof, and the decision should weigh installed cost against the warranted life, not the per-square-foot material price alone.

Attachment: mechanically attached, fully adhered, or ballasted

A single-ply roof is held down one of three ways, and the membrane and the deck and the wind drive which one. A mechanically attached system fastens the membrane to the deck with screws and plates, usually in rows that fall in the seam laps. A fully adhered system glues the whole sheet down with adhesive and has no field fasteners. A ballasted system lays the membrane loose and holds it with stone or pavers. All three work with all three membranes, with some practical limits by system.

The attachment is mostly a wind decision. Fully adhered systems generally reach higher wind-uplift ratings, because the bond is spread across the whole sheet instead of concentrated at fastener rows, which is why they show up on tall buildings, coastal exposures, and corners and perimeters where uplift is highest. Mechanically attached systems depend entirely on the fastener pattern and density, engineered to the wind load. Ballasted systems use weight, which limits them to roofs with the slope and the structural capacity to carry the stone.

On a mechanically attached roof the seam carries both the watertightness and the wind load, because the fasteners live in the lap. That is covered in the companion seam-QA guide, and it changes what the seam has to do. The point for selection is that the membrane choice and the attachment choice are not independent. A reflective white roof that needs to survive a coastal wind event may push you to fully adhered, and that pushes the cost. Confirm the attachment and the fastening pattern against the engineered wind-uplift requirement, because the pattern is designed, not chosen on the roof.

Thickness, reinforcement, and the warranty

Single-ply membranes come in standard thicknesses, commonly 45, 60, and 80 mil, where a mil is one thousandth of an inch, and the thickness ties directly to the warranty term. Thicker membrane carries a longer warranty and a longer realistic life, because there is more material to give up to weathering, foot traffic, and hail before the sheet is compromised. As a common pattern, 45 mil is the budget tier on shorter warranties, 60 mil is the industry default at a mid-length term, and the thickest options carry the longest warranties. Confirm the exact ladder against the manufacturer, because it varies by product and by membrane.

Reinforcement is a separate axis from thickness. A reinforced membrane has a polyester scrim or fabric laminated inside the sheet that adds tensile strength, puncture resistance, and dimensional stability. TPO and most field PVC are reinforced by design. EPDM comes both ways, reinforced and non-reinforced, and the non-reinforced rubber is more elastic but more vulnerable to puncture. The reinforced versions are the workhorses for most commercial fields. Match the reinforcement to the traffic and the exposure the roof will see.

The thickness decision is where contractors quietly give away the warranty. Spec a 60 mil roof, install 45 to save material, and the manufacturer's inspection can catch it and decline the warranty, the same way a thin coating fails its closeout, which the companion guide on coating mil thickness covers in detail. The thickness is also what the no-dollar-limit warranty, the NDL, is written around. An NDL warranty covers the full cost of repair on the system for the term with no cap, but it issues only after the manufacturer's inspection confirms the right products went on at the right thickness. The mils are not where you find savings on a single-ply roof. They are where the warranty lives.

Fire, wind, and code listings

The membrane has to carry the fire and wind ratings the code and the insurer demand, and that is assembly-level, not membrane-level. A roof assembly carries a UL fire classification and a wind-uplift rating that depend on the whole buildup, the deck, the insulation, the attachment, and the membrane together, not the membrane alone. A membrane that performs in one assembly can fail the rating in another, so the listed assembly is what governs, not the data sheet for the sheet by itself.

Wind uplift commonly runs against ASCE 7 for the loads, with FM Global data sheets adding their own requirements on insured buildings and SPRI publishing wind-design standards for single-ply systems. The fastener pattern or the adhesive system is engineered to that load, tightening at the corners and perimeter where uplift peaks. On an FM-insured building, the FM approval of the specific assembly is often the controlling document, and it can rule out a buildup that would otherwise pass code.

For selection, the practical effect is that fire and wind rarely pick the membrane by themselves, because all three can be built into rated assemblies. What they do is constrain the attachment, the insulation, and the cover board, which feeds back into cost. Confirm the required fire classification and wind rating against the adopted building code, the AHJ, and the insurer, then build the assembly that carries them.

Field-quality dependence: the weld and the prep

Every single-ply membrane is only as good as the seam someone made in the field, and the failure point differs by family. Thermoplastics live or die on the weld. A TPO or PVC roof can have flawless membrane and still leak at a cold weld, a seam that looks closed but never reached full fusion because the welder ran too cold, too fast, or over a dirty lap. The defense is the daily trial weld, the probe of every lineal foot, and the destructive sample, all covered in the companion seam-QA guide. A welded roof with no seam QC is a gamble dressed up as a system.

EPDM lives or dies on the prep. The tape seam holds only if the lap was cleaned, primed, and rolled, and the most common EPDM failures trace straight to a skipped primer, a tape that was never rolled so air stayed trapped, or a wrinkle rolled into the lap. There is no weld to probe, so the QC is watching the prep happen and lift-testing the result.

This matters for selection more than it looks. A welded thermoplastic is more forgiving of a future repair, because you can weld a patch into the field at any time and it fuses. An EPDM repair depends on cleaning and priming an aged, possibly contaminated surface, which is harder to get right years later. If the building will see ongoing rooftop work, penetrations added over time, equipment swapped out, the repairability of a welded membrane is a real advantage. Weigh who maintains the roof, not just who installs it.

Recover versus tear-off and substrate compatibility

On a re-roof you choose between tearing the old roof off and recovering over it, and the membrane has to be compatible with whatever it touches. A recover leaves the existing roof in place and installs the new membrane over it, usually over a cover board or insulation, which saves the tear-off cost and keeps the building dry during the work. The code limits how many roof layers a building can carry, commonly two, and a wet or failing existing roof has to come off regardless, so recover is not always on the table.

PVC has a hard compatibility rule that catches people. PVC is not compatible with asphalt and other petroleum-based materials. The plasticizers in flexible PVC react with bitumen, and in direct contact the plasticizers can dissolve the asphalt and the membrane loses the plasticizer it needs to stay flexible. So PVC cannot go directly over an asphalt built-up roof or a modified-bitumen roof. It needs a separator, a slip sheet or a cover board, between the PVC and the asphalt to keep them apart. NRCA and the manufacturers call for that separation, and skipping it is a known failure.

TPO and EPDM have their own compatibility considerations, but the asphalt incompatibility is PVC's signature constraint and the one most often missed on a recover. Before you recover with any membrane, confirm what the new sheet will be in contact with and what separation the manufacturer requires. On an asphalt substrate under PVC, the separator sheet is not optional, and the inspector and the warranty both expect it to be there.

Ponding water and slope

Standing water is a service condition the membrane has to tolerate, and the three differ in how well they take it. PVC and EPDM both handle ponding reasonably well, and PVC in particular is comfortable with standing water. TPO tolerates ponding too, though prolonged ponding is harder on any membrane and many warranties limit or exclude it. The membrane choice is part of the answer on a roof that ponds, but it is not the whole answer.

The real fix for ponding is slope, not membrane. A roof ponds because it lacks the slope to drain or because water dams behind a curb or a low spot, and no membrane solves that. It just waterproofs the puddle. The durable fix is to add slope with tapered insulation and to split water around obstructions with crickets, which is the work covered in the companion guide on sloping a flat roof to drain, and it should be priced into the re-roof when ponding is the existing problem.

Read the warranty drainage language before you promise a ponding roof anything. Manufacturers often require the roof to drain within a set time and may exclude damage in areas that pond, so a membrane that physically tolerates standing water can still sit outside its warranty if the roof does not drain as the warranty demands. Decide whether you are restoring the surface or fixing the drainage, and price for the one you are actually doing.

The decision framework: which membrane for which building

Strip the brands away and the decision falls out of the building's conditions. Pick PVC when the roof has grease or chemical exposure, a restaurant, a commercial kitchen, an industrial discharge, because PVC is the only one of the three that survives it long-term, and pick it as well when you want a welded reflective roof with the longest thermoplastic track record and the budget allows the premium. The exposure is the deciding condition, and where it is present the other two are off the table.

Pick EPDM when cold flexibility and proven longevity lead the requirements and a cool roof is not mandated, a heating-dominated northern climate, a roof where the longest field history matters, or a tight budget that still needs a durable system. Black EPDM in the cold can even help with snowmelt and winter heat. Pick TPO when you want a reflective cool roof at a moderate cost and the roof has no grease exposure, which describes a large share of warm-climate and energy-code-driven commercial buildings, and accept that the longest field data on current formulations is shorter than EPDM's.

Then size it. Once the chemistry is set by the conditions, the thickness comes from the warranty term the owner needs, the attachment comes from the wind load and the deck, and the assembly comes from the fire and code requirements. The membrane is the first decision, but it is not the last one, and a right membrane on a wrong attachment or a thin build still fails. Run the conditions in order and the roof specifies itself.

Where mod-bit and BUR still fit

Single-ply is not the only low-slope option, and modified bitumen and built-up roofing still earn their place on the right building. Built-up roofing, the classic tar-and-gravel system, and modified bitumen, the rolled asphalt sheets, are multi-ply systems. They build redundancy by stacking layers, so a breach in one ply does not necessarily reach the deck. On a roof where that redundancy is worth paying for, the multi-ply systems have a real argument that a single sheet cannot make.

Two cases favor them. High-traffic roofs, where maintenance crews, equipment, and foot traffic abuse the surface daily, hold up well in a granulated mod-bit cap that takes the wear. And amenity decks, plaza roofs, and roofs that carry pavers or planting often use a built-up or mod-bit base under the wear course, because the redundancy and the proven waterproofing matter more than the weight or the reflectivity there. These are not nostalgia picks. They are the right system for those conditions.

For most ordinary commercial low-slope roofs, single-ply has taken the market because it installs faster, weighs less, and reflects heat the asphalt systems cannot. But when a building needs multi-ply redundancy or a tough trafficked surface, mod-bit and BUR are still the answer, and a specifier who only knows single-ply is missing part of the toolkit.

The honest tradeoffs and the marketing to ignore

Every manufacturer will tell you their membrane is the best, and on a comparison roof that noise is the enemy of a good decision. The brochure claims tend to inflate the one thing the product leads on and stay quiet about where it loses. TPO marketing leans on the cost and the reflectivity and skips the early-formulation history. PVC marketing leans on the chemical resistance and underplays the plasticizer aging. EPDM marketing leans on the longevity and the cost and waves past the black-roof energy penalty and the old seam reputation.

The real differences are narrower and more conditional than the marketing makes them sound. All three are proven systems that perform when installed right on the building they suit. The genuine separators are the few conditions that actually flip the decision: grease and chemicals to PVC, cold and longevity to EPDM, cool-roof and moderate cost to TPO. Outside those, much of the argument is preference and habit dressed up as engineering.

So distrust the pitch that says one membrane wins everywhere. The honest version is that the building picks the membrane, and the specifier's job is to read the conditions and ignore the brand loyalty, including their own. The contractor who installs only one system will recommend that system for every roof, which is exactly the failure this guide is built to prevent.

What to specify and document

The selection is a decision someone has to defend later, when the roof underperforms or the warranty is questioned, so the record is the membrane, the reasoning, and the conditions that drove it. The comparison below is the planning frame. The actual spec carries the specific product, the thickness, the attachment, the assembly, and the warranty, and the file should show why each was chosen against the building's conditions, not just what was installed.

Capture the deciding conditions in the record: the chemical and grease exposure, the climate and any cool-roof requirement, the wind load and the attachment it drove, the substrate and any compatibility separation, the thickness and the warranty term it buys, and the fire and code listing the assembly carries. That is the document that answers the owner's question in year four about why this membrane and not another, and it is the same file the manufacturer's inspection reads before the warranty issues.

Common mistakes

• Putting TPO or EPDM on a restaurant or grease roof, where the cooking oils degrade both and PVC was the only durable choice.
• Choosing the membrane by brand loyalty or contractor habit instead of by the building's exposure, climate, and warranty needs.
• Specifying a thin membrane to save material, then losing the warranty when the manufacturer's inspection finds it light.
• Installing PVC directly over an asphalt built-up or modified-bitumen roof with no separator sheet, so the plasticizers attack the asphalt.
• Picking an attachment that does not match the wind load, so a mechanically attached roof peels at the corners under uplift.
• Specifying black EPDM where the energy code or a cool-roof program required a reflective surface.
• Treating ponding as a membrane problem and skipping the slope fix, so the water keeps sitting and the warranty excludes it.
• Assuming early-TPO problems apply to current formulations, or assuming current TPO has EPDM's length of field history.
• Comparing only material cost per square foot and ignoring the attachment, insulation, and labor that drive the installed price.

Field selection checklist

Standards and references

The document that governs the membrane and the warranty is the manufacturer's published system and warranty, full stop. It sets the approved assembly, the thickness, the attachment, the compatibility rules, and the conditions the warranty requires, and the closeout inspection is run against it. Everything below is the framework around that controlling document, so confirm the specifics against the actual product.

The ASTM material specifications define what each membrane has to be. ASTM D6878 covers thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) sheet roofing, ASTM D4434 covers polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sheet roofing, and ASTM D4637 covers EPDM sheet for single-ply roof membranes. Those standards classify the sheet, including reinforced and non-reinforced types, and reference the test methods behind the physical properties. Confirm the current designation and edition before citing one on a submittal, because these get revised across cycles.

Around the material standards sits the rest of the framework. The NRCA Roofing Manual is the practical reference for single-ply selection and installation. Wind uplift runs under ASCE 7 for the loads, with FM Global data sheets adding requirements on insured roofs and SPRI publishing single-ply wind-design standards. Fire and the overall assembly carry UL listings, and reflectance and cool-roof requirements come from the adopted energy code and rating programs such as the Cool Roof Rating Council and ENERGY STAR. The building code adopts these by jurisdiction and amends them, so confirm the requirement against the adopted edition, the AHJ, and the project specification, and let the manufacturer's warranty override any rule of thumb.

Units, terms, and conversions

Membrane selection uses a small, specific vocabulary, and the same idea reads differently across a spec, a data sheet, and a warranty, so the terms are worth pinning down.

Membrane thickness is given in mils, thousandths of an inch, with common single-ply at 45, 60, and 80 mil. A thermoplastic membrane re-melts with heat and is hot-air welded; a thermoset membrane does not re-melt and is seamed with tape and adhesive. A cool roof is a reflective roof that lowers surface temperature, rated by solar reflectance index. Fully adhered, mechanically attached, and ballasted are the three attachment methods. An NDL warranty is the no-dollar-limit, full-cost manufacturer warranty issued after the closeout inspection.

TPO

Thermoplastic polyolefin, a white, heat-weldable, reflective single-ply membrane at a moderate cost

PVC

Polyvinyl chloride, a heat-weldable thermoplastic membrane, the chemical and grease resistance leader

EPDM

Ethylene propylene diene monomer, a thermoset rubber membrane with tape seams, the longevity and cold-flexibility leader

Thermoplastic / thermoset

Thermoplastic re-melts with heat so seams weld; thermoset is cured and does not re-melt, so seams are taped

Mil

One thousandth of an inch (0.001 in); membrane thickness, commonly 45, 60, or 80 mil

Cool roof

A reflective roof surface that lowers surface temperature and cooling load, rated by solar reflectance index

Fully adhered

Membrane glued across the whole sheet with adhesive; generally the highest wind-uplift attachment

NDL warranty

No-dollar-limit warranty covering full repair cost on the system, issued after the manufacturer's inspection

Related tools

Calculators and readiness checks for this work

Compare your options

FAQ

People also ask

• How do you test a TPO seam in the field?
• What is the difference between wet mils and dry mils?
• What is an EPDM roof?
• What is a cool roof?
• What is a roof restoration coating?